Skip to content
EnergyCalcHQ
IS 1180 · IEC 60076 · IEC 60909

Transformer Sizing & Fault Level

Full load current on both windings, how hard the transformer is really working, and the prospective fault current at the LV terminals — the number that decides what your incomer and busbar have to survive.

Transformer

Connected load

LV full load current
840A
At 433 V. Smallest standard incomer frame: 1,000 A.
Fault current at LV terminals
16.8kA
Use switchgear rated 25 kA Icu or better. Peak withstand 42 kA.
HV full load current33.1A
Load on transformer444.4kVA
Loading70.5%
Spare capacity185.6kVA
Fault level12.6MVA
Peak asymmetrical42.0kA

For page numbers, keep Headers and footers ticked under More settings in the print dialog.

Full load current

A transformer is rated in kVA, not kW, because it does not care about your power factor — it cares about the current in its windings. On a three-phase transformer:

I = kVA × 1000 / (√3 × V)

Use the winding voltage on the side you are asking about. A 630 kVA 11 kV / 433 V transformer carries about 33 A on the HV side and 840 A on the LV side — same power, twenty-five times the current, which is the whole reason distribution is done at 11 kV.

Note the 433 V. Indian distribution transformers are wound for 433 V at no load so that the voltage has somewhere to fall to as load comes on, landing near 415 V at the board. Size the incomer on 433 V and you are on the safe side.

What per cent impedance actually means

The nameplate figure — 4.5 %, 5 %, 6.25 % — is the fraction of rated voltage you have to apply to the primary, with the secondary shorted, to drive full load current. Turn that around and it tells you the fault current:

I_fault = I_full load / (Z% / 100)
Fault MVA = kVA / (Z% / 100)

At 5 % impedance a transformer will push twenty times its full load current into a bolted fault on its terminals. For the 630 kVA set above, that is roughly 17 kA. Every device on that busbar must be able to make and break it.

This is why impedance is not a number to minimise. Low impedance means better voltage regulation and a worse fault level; high impedance means the opposite. IS 1180 fixes it by rating precisely so that switchgear selection stays predictable.

Peak versus rms

The kA figure above is symmetrical rms. In the first half cycle the current is offset by the DC component and peaks far higher. IEC 60909 uses a factor of about 2.5 for LV systems, and that peak is what bends busbars — it sets the mechanical bracing, while the rms value sets the breaking capacity. Two different numbers for two different failure modes.

Assumptions, and where they break

  • Infinite source. The calculation ignores the impedance of the 11 kV network behind the transformer. Real networks lower the fault current, so this figure is conservative — which is the direction you want to be wrong in when rating switchgear.
  • Terminal fault only. Add a few metres of cable and the fault current drops fast. Do not use the terminal figure to check discrimination at a downstream board.
  • Motor contribution ignored. Running motors feed into a fault for the first few cycles. On a motor-heavy plant add roughly 4 times the connected motor full load current to the peak.

How much load should a transformer carry?

LoadingWhat it means
Under 60 %Oversized. Iron losses run 24×7 whether you use it or not.
60–80 %The sweet spot — near peak efficiency, room to grow.
80–100 %Working hard. Plan the next transformer now.
Over 100 %Insulation life halves for roughly every 6 °C of extra winding temperature. Short overloads are survivable; a permanent one is a slow write-off.

Remember that the loading figure here is kVA, not kW. Poor power factor loads the transformer without doing any more work — fix the power factor and you may find you do not need the bigger transformer at all.

Vector group, and why Dyn11 is the default

The nameplate carries a code like Dyn11: delta primary, star secondary, neutral brought out, secondary lagging the primary by 330 degrees. Each letter earns its place. The delta on the HV side gives third-harmonic circulating currents somewhere to go instead of distorting the supply, and it means an LV earth fault does not reflect straight back into the 11 kV network as an unbalanced load.

The star on the LV side is what gives you a neutral at all, and with it the 240 V single-phase supplies every small load on the site expects. Earth that star point and you have fixed the system voltage reference — which is what makes an earth fault a large, detectable current rather than a slow rise in touch voltage on every enclosure.

The number matters when two transformers have to run in parallel. Group numbers are clock positions, and only transformers with the same displacement can be paralleled — a Dyn11 and a Dyn1 differ by 60 degrees, and connecting them puts that difference across the winding impedance as a permanent circulating current. Matching impedance to within about 10 per cent matters too, or the lower-impedance unit takes more than its share of the load and reaches its temperature limit first.

Inrush, and the protection setting it forces

Energise an unloaded transformer at the wrong point on the voltage wave and the core saturates. The first peak of magnetising inrush reaches 8 to 12 times full load current, decaying over a few hundred milliseconds to nothing. No fault is present, and the transformer is fine.

The protection does not know that. An HV fuse or overcurrent relay set purely on full load current will clear on every energisation, which is why the HV protection on a distribution transformer is deliberately slow and set high — and why the fault level you calculate here does not translate directly into a relay setting. Inrush is rich in second-harmonic content, so differential relays on larger units restrain on it rather than time-grading around it.

It also explains a fault that looks electrical and is not: a transformer that trips only on a Monday morning is usually being energised into a cold, fully connected load rather than suffering anything wrong with its windings.

Questions people ask

What size transformer does a 400 kW load need?
Size it in kVA, because the windings carry current regardless of your power factor. At 0.85 power factor a 400 kW load is 470 kVA, and you want to land in the 60 to 80 per cent band — so a 630 kVA unit, which puts it at 75 per cent with room to grow. Note what this means in reverse: correcting the power factor first may mean you do not need the bigger transformer at all.
Why does the calculator use 433 V and not 415 V?
Because that is what Indian distribution transformers are wound for. The secondary is 433 V at no load so the voltage has somewhere to fall to as load comes on, landing near 415 V at the board. Full load current is a winding figure, so it is calculated at 433 V — which also gives the larger number, and sizing the incomer on the larger number is the safe side to be on.
Is a lower percentage impedance better?
No — it is a trade, which is why IS 1180 fixes it by rating rather than leaving it to be minimised. Low impedance gives better voltage regulation and a worse fault level; high impedance gives the opposite. At 5 per cent a transformer will push twenty times its full load current into a bolted fault on its terminals, and every device on that busbar has to make and break it.
How heavily should a transformer be loaded?
Below 60 per cent it is oversized and its iron losses run around the clock whether you use the capacity or not. 60 to 80 per cent is the sweet spot — near peak efficiency, with room to grow. 80 to 100 per cent is working hard, and the time to plan the next one. Above 100 per cent, insulation life halves for roughly every 6 °C of extra winding temperature: short overloads are survivable, a permanent one is a slow write-off.
Why is the HV protection on a distribution transformer set so high?
Because of magnetising inrush. Energise an unloaded transformer at the wrong point on the voltage wave and the core saturates: the first peak reaches 8 to 12 times full load current, decaying over a few hundred milliseconds to nothing, with no fault present and nothing wrong. A fuse or overcurrent relay set on full load current alone would clear on every energisation. It is also why the fault level calculated here does not translate directly into a relay setting.