Transformer Sizing & Fault Level
Full load current on both windings, how hard the transformer is really working, and the prospective fault current at the LV terminals — the number that decides what your incomer and busbar have to survive.
Transformer
Connected load
| Project | Circuit ref | ||
| Prepared by | Date | ||
| Checked by | Date |
Transformer Sizing & Fault Level · IS 1180 · IEC 60076 · IEC 60909 · EnergyCalcHQ · energycalchq.com
Preliminary calculation. The figures behind it are representative values for the stated conditions, not a substitute for the current edition of the standard or the manufacturer's published data. Verify before issuing for construction. Not a substitute for a qualified engineer or a protection study.
For page numbers, keep Headers and footers ticked under More settings in the print dialog.
Full load current
A transformer is rated in kVA, not kW, because it does not care about your power factor — it cares about the current in its windings. On a three-phase transformer:
I = kVA × 1000 / (√3 × V)Use the winding voltage on the side you are asking about. A 630 kVA 11 kV / 433 V transformer carries about 33 A on the HV side and 840 A on the LV side — same power, twenty-five times the current, which is the whole reason distribution is done at 11 kV.
Note the 433 V. Indian distribution transformers are wound for 433 V at no load so that the voltage has somewhere to fall to as load comes on, landing near 415 V at the board. Size the incomer on 433 V and you are on the safe side.
What per cent impedance actually means
The nameplate figure — 4.5 %, 5 %, 6.25 % — is the fraction of rated voltage you have to apply to the primary, with the secondary shorted, to drive full load current. Turn that around and it tells you the fault current:
I_fault = I_full load / (Z% / 100)
Fault MVA = kVA / (Z% / 100)At 5 % impedance a transformer will push twenty times its full load current into a bolted fault on its terminals. For the 630 kVA set above, that is roughly 17 kA. Every device on that busbar must be able to make and break it.
This is why impedance is not a number to minimise. Low impedance means better voltage regulation and a worse fault level; high impedance means the opposite. IS 1180 fixes it by rating precisely so that switchgear selection stays predictable.
Peak versus rms
The kA figure above is symmetrical rms. In the first half cycle the current is offset by the DC component and peaks far higher. IEC 60909 uses a factor of about 2.5 for LV systems, and that peak is what bends busbars — it sets the mechanical bracing, while the rms value sets the breaking capacity. Two different numbers for two different failure modes.
Assumptions, and where they break
- Infinite source. The calculation ignores the impedance of the 11 kV network behind the transformer. Real networks lower the fault current, so this figure is conservative — which is the direction you want to be wrong in when rating switchgear.
- Terminal fault only. Add a few metres of cable and the fault current drops fast. Do not use the terminal figure to check discrimination at a downstream board.
- Motor contribution ignored. Running motors feed into a fault for the first few cycles. On a motor-heavy plant add roughly 4 times the connected motor full load current to the peak.
How much load should a transformer carry?
| Loading | What it means |
|---|---|
| Under 60 % | Oversized. Iron losses run 24×7 whether you use it or not. |
| 60–80 % | The sweet spot — near peak efficiency, room to grow. |
| 80–100 % | Working hard. Plan the next transformer now. |
| Over 100 % | Insulation life halves for roughly every 6 °C of extra winding temperature. Short overloads are survivable; a permanent one is a slow write-off. |
Remember that the loading figure here is kVA, not kW. Poor power factor loads the transformer without doing any more work — fix the power factor and you may find you do not need the bigger transformer at all.